中国口腔医学继续教育杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 1-10.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqjxjyzz.2026.01.001

• 临床研究 •    下一篇

我国牙科汞合金临床应用和认知情况调查分析

刘雪楠1, 司燕1, 侯敏2, 范宝林1, 俞光岩1, 郭传瑸1, 岳林1,*   

  1. 1北京大学口腔医学院,国家口腔疾病临床研究中心,口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室;
    2中华口腔医学会
  • 出版日期:2026-01-31 发布日期:2026-01-31
  • 通讯作者: *岳林,联系方式:010-82195226,电子邮箱:yuelin@cndent.com,通讯地址:北京市海淀区中关村南大街22号,100081
  • 作者简介:#共同第一作者

Investigation and Analysis on the Clinical Application and Awareness of Dental Amalgam in China

Xuenan Liu1, Yan Si1, Min Hou2, Baolin Fan1, Guangyan Yu1, Chuanbin Guo1, Lin Yue1,*   

  1. 1Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, P.R. China;
    2Chinese Stomatological Association, Beijing, P.R. China
  • Online:2026-01-31 Published:2026-01-31
  • Contact: Lin Yue. Tel: 010-82195586. Email: yuelin@cndent.com. Address: No.22, Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, P.R. China.
  • About author:#These authors contribute equally to this manuscript.

摘要: 目的: 了解中国目前口腔医疗机构应用牙科汞合金的状况,为我国政府履约和制定政策提供依据。方法: 采用横断面研究,面向我国口腔医师、口腔医疗机构和生产企业开展临床使用、医师态度、部门监管、生产和销售等情况问卷调查。定量描述采用均数、标准差计算,定性描述使用例数及百分数计算,分类数据采用卡方检验,P<0.05。结果: 仅8.4%的医疗机构和6.1%的口腔医师目前还在使用,主要来自二级综合医院口腔科和口腔诊所(P<0.001)。44.3%的口腔医师了解《关于汞的水俣公约》,公立医疗机构的比例高于民营医疗机构(P<0.001),二级及以上口腔专科医院/牙防所的比例高于其他类别的医疗机构(P<0.001),认为牙科汞合金“应完全禁止”和“可有限制”使用的口腔医师分别为42.0%和55.2%。31.6%的医疗机构接受过相关部门的监管检查。牙科汞合金每年生产和销售量从2018年到2022年都呈现下降趋势。结论: 我国在积极履约方面所开展的工作卓有成效,需继续采取多种措施促进淘汰临床使用汞合金。

关键词: 牙科汞合金, 汞公约, 问卷调查, 临床应用, 中国

Abstract: Objective: This study aims to investigate the current application status of dental amalgam in dental healthcare instituions in China, to provide a basis for the Chinese government to fulfill its obligations and formulate policies. Methods: A cross-sectional study was adopted to conduct a questionnaire survey among Chinese dentists, dental institutions and manufacturing enterprises on clinical application, dentists’ attitudes, departmental supervision, production and sales, etc. Quantitative description was calculated by mean and standard deviation, qualitative description was calculated by the number of cases and percentages, and chi-square test was used for categorical data, with P<0.05. Results: Only 8.4% of the institutions and 6.1% of dentists still used dental amalgam. The main users were secondary general hospitals with dental departments and dental clinics (P<0.001). 44.3% of dentists indicated that they were aware of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. The proportion in public institutions was higher than that in private institutions (P<0.001), and the proportion in secondary and above dental specialized hospitals/dental prevention institutions was higher than other types of hospital institutions (P<0.001). The proportion of dentists who agreed with that dental amalgam “should be completely banned ‘or’ can be used with restrictions” were 42.0% and 55.2% respectively. 31.6% of the institutions indicated that they had been subject to mercury-related supervision by relevant departments. The average annual production, domestic sales volume and export sales volume of capsule-type silver amalgam all decreased from 2018 to 2022. Conclusions: China has achieved significant results in fulfilling the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Multiple measures should be continuously taken to reduce and eventually eliminate dental amalgam.

Key words: dental amalgam, Minamata Convention on Mercury, questionnaire survey, clinical practice, China