中国口腔医学继续教育杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 479-493.DOI: 10.12337/zgkqjxjyzz.2024.06.004

• 病例报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

矢状向引导型互阻式矫形技术在生长改良中的应用1例

严子欣1,2,3, 曹晔1,2,3, 严斌1,2,3, 刘璐玮1,2,3,*   

  1. 1南京医科大学附属口腔医院口腔正畸科;
    2江苏省口腔疾病研究重点实验室;
    3江苏省口腔转化医学工程研究中心
  • 出版日期:2024-11-30 发布日期:2025-06-06
  • 通讯作者: *刘璐玮,联系方式:025-69593060,电子邮箱:liuluwei_orth@njmu.edu.cn,通讯地址:江苏省南京市鼓楼区上海路1号,210029

Sagittal-guidance Twin-block Appliance in Atypical Growth Modification Therapy: A Case Report

Zixin Yan1,2,3, Ye Cao1,2,3, Bin Yan1,2,3, Luwei Liu1,2,3,*   

  1. 1Department of Orthodontics, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China;
    2State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Research, Prevention and Treatment for Oral Diseases, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China;
    3Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Centre of Stomatological Translational Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China
  • Online:2024-11-30 Published:2025-06-06
  • Contact: Luwei Liu. Tel: 025-69593060. Email: liuluwei_orth@njmu.edu.cn. Address: No.1 Shanghai Road, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China.

摘要: 目的:本文展示1例粘接式矢状向引导型互阻式矫形技术(sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance,SGTB)于生长改良中的应用。诊治经过:在明确诊断且征得患者及家长同意后,对患者先采用粘接式SGTB导下颌向前、扩大上牙弓及初步排齐并内收上前牙,拆除SGTB后行固定矫治。结果: 矫治时间共22个月。治疗结束后下颌生长,结合牙性移动与牙槽骨改建,建立前牙正常覆𬌗、覆盖关系及磨牙中性关系,侧貌直。治疗3年半后随访疗效稳定。结论: 粘接式SGTB适用于颌面部生长发育高峰期尾声患者。对于错过生长发育高峰期的患者,当生长改良可能有益时可尝试进行治疗。

关键词: 矢状向引导型互阻式矫形技术, 双牙合垫矫治器, 生长改良治疗, 早期矫治, 骨性Ⅱ类错牙合畸形

Abstract: Objectives: This case reported the use of sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance (SGTB) in the treatment of a patient with growth modification therapy. Diagnosis and Treatment: Following an accurate diagnosis and the patient’s informed consent, we protruded the mandible forward, expanded the upper arch and slightly aligned and retracted the maxillary front teeth using an adhesive SGTB. The brackets were bonded to finish fixed orthodontic treatment after the SGTB was removed. Results: The overall treatment time was 22 months. Mandibular growth in conjunction with dental movement and alveolar bone remodeling contributed to the favorable skeletal and dental relationships and soft tissue profile, with no relapse after three and a half years of follow-up. Conclusions: Adhesive SGTB is appropriate for patients reaching the end of maxillofacial growth peak. Growth modification therapy may also be tried on patients who have passed the peak of growth if it is expected to be beneficial to them.

Key words: sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance, Twin-block appliance, growth modification therapy, early orthodontic treatment, skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion;