[1] Kuper NK, Opdam NJM, Ruben JL, et al.Gap size and wall lesion development next to composite. J Dent Res, 2014, 93(7_suppl):108S-113S.
[2] Laske M, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, et al.Longevity of direct restorations in Dutch dental practices. Descriptive study out of a practice based research network. J Dent, 2016, 46:12-17.
[3] Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, et al.A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater, 2007, 23(1):2-8.
[4] Brouwer F, Askar H, Paris S, et al.Detecting secondary caries lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res, 2016, 95(2):143-151.
[5] Keys W, Carson SJ.Rubber dam may increase the survival time of dental restorations. Evid Based Dent, 2017, 18(1): 19-20.
[6] Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, et al.Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(12): 1176-1184.
[7] Ludlow Sw, Farmer Sn, Donaldson Me, et al.Micro-leakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations with selective enamel etching. Oper dent, 2014, 39(4):E154-9. |
